- Home
Critical Approaches to Peacebuilding
N/A
The goal
The course aims to introduce students with the concept of peacebuilding in conflict-affected and post-conflict societies. This international practice has been globally present in the last thirty years and has had a profound influence on the post-war developments of the countries in the Global South. By focusing on the Balkan, Middle East, and Sub-Saharan Africa case studies, the course tries to assess achievements and shortcomings of the dominant form of peacebuilding - liberal peacebuilding. It also offers a deeper understanding of the liberal peacebuilding critique and its alternative forms - local (bottom-up) peacebuilding, everyday peace, and hybridity. Finally, the course provides a comparative overview of the impact of peacebuilding on political and socio-economic institutions in post-conflict and conflict-affected societies. The course is grounded in critical peace and conflict studies and offers the perspective of a Global South scholars who have personal encounters with the practice of peacebuilding.
The outcome
By the end of the course, students should be able to:
- Inform themselves about the process of peacebuilding and international interventions in the Global South;
- Identify and critically analyse key actors, processes and modes of intervention in contemporary peacebuilding missions;
- Evaluate political and socio-economic effects of liberal peacebuidling in post-conflict and conflict-affected societies;
- Recognize and critically assess responds made by local populations in relations to development model enforced upon them;
- Understand how violent conflict and peacebuilding could affect human development indicators in post-conflict and conflict-affected societies.
Contents of lectures
1. Introductory lecture
2. Global Violence Revisited
3. Peacebuilding in post-conflict societies
4. Liberal peacebuilding
5. The hybridity, local peace and the resistance
6. The case study: Bosnia and Herzegovina
7. Coffee talk: Discussion about the book “Peaceland” by Severine Autesserre
8. Midterm assignments presentation
9. Reconciliation in divided societies
10. The case study: Reconciliation in former Yugoslavia
11. Peacebuilding, gender and sexual violence: Discussion about the movie “The Whistlerblower”
12. Student presentations
13. Reading week
14. Reading week
15. Exam
-
Autesserre, Severine. 2014. Peaceland. New York: Cambridge University Press
(Original) -
Mac, Andrew. 2007. Global Political Violence: Explaining the Post-Cold War Decline. International Peace Academy
(Original) -
Ramsbotham, Oliver, Woodhouse, Tom and Miall, Hugh. 2016. Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge: Polity, 68-109
(Original) -
Bellamy, Alex and Paul Williams. 2010. Understanding Peacekeeping. London: Polity, 173-278
(Original) -
Mac Ginty, Roger. 2010. “Hybrid Peace: The Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Peace.” Security Dialogue 41 (4): 391–412
(Original) -
Mac Ginty, Roger. 2014. “Everyday Peace: Bottom-Up and Local Agency in Conflict-Affected Societies.” Security Dialogue, 45 (6): 548-564
(Original) -
Mac Ginty, Roger. 2011. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.19-47
(Original) -
Richmond, Oliver. 2014. Failed Statebuilding. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 62-103 only
(Original) -
Paris, Roland. 2010. “Saving Liberal Peacebuilding.” Review of International Studies 36 (2): 337-365
(Original) -
Chandler, David. 2014. “Resilience and the ‘Everyday’: Beyond the Paradox of “Liberal Peace”.” Review of International Studies 41 (1): 27–48
(Original) -
Lemay-Hebert, Nicolas. 2011.The "Empty-Shell Approach: The Setup Process of International Administrations in Timor-Leste and Kosovo, Its Consequences and Lessons." International Studies Perspectives 12: 190–211
(Original) -
Chandler, David. 2006. "State-Building in Bosnia: The Limits of ‘Informal Trusteeship’" . International Journal of Peace Studies 11 (1)
(Original) -
Franks, Jason and Richmond, P. Oliver. 2008. "Coopting Liberal Peace-building: Untying the Gordian Knot in Kosovo." Cooperation and Conflict 43: 81-103
(Original) -
Belloni, Roberto. 2001. "Civil Society and Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina." Journal of Peace Research 38 (2): 163-180
(Original) -
David, Lea. 2017. “Against Standardization of Memory.” Human Rights Quarterly 39 (2): 296-318
(Original) -
Jansen, Stef. 2013. “If Reconciliation Is the Answer, Are We Asking the Right Questions?” Studies in Social Justice 7 (2): 229-243
(Original) -
Miloš Bešić and Nemanja Džuverović. 2020. “How many truths are there? Reconciliation and agonistic dialogue in the former Yugoslavia.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20 (3): 455-472
(Original) -
Hamber, Brandon, Dineo Nageng and Gabriel O'Malley. 2000. “Telling It Like It Is...: Understanding the Truth and Reconciliation Commission from the Perspective of Survivors.” Psychology in Society 26: 18-42
(Original) -
Theidon, Kimberly. 2007. "Gender in Transition: Common Sense, Women, and War." Journal of Human Rights 6(4): 453-478
(Original) -
Hromadzic, Azra. 2006. "Challenging the Discourse of the Bosnian War Rapes." In Johnson, Janet E., and Jean C. Robinson, eds., Living with Gender after Communism. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, pp. 169-184
(Original) -
Das, Veena. 2004. "Language and Body: Transactions in the Construction of Pain." In Scheper-Hughes and Bourgois, eds., Violence in War and Peace: An Anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 327-333
(Original) -
Levy, Barry S., et.al. 2008. "Part IV: Vulnerable Populations." In Levy and Sidel, eds. War and Public Health. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 179-226
(Original) -
(movie) Why We Fight, directed by Eugene Jarecki, 2005
(Original) -
(movie) The Whistleblower, directed by Larysa Kondracki, 2010
(Original) -
(movie) No Man’s Land, directed by Danis Tanovic, 2001
(Original) -
(movie) Tangerines, directed by Zaza Urushadze, 2013
(Original) -
(movie) Hotel Rwanda, directed by Terry George, 2004
(Original)
Pre-exam obligations
20
20
30
Final exam
30
lectures, book discussions, movie discussions, ethnographic fieldwork, visit to museums, protests and rallies, student presentations, one on one supervision, peer mentorship