Kritički pristupi izgradnji mira

Ciljevi izučavanja predmeta

The course aims to introduce students with the concept of peacebuilding in conflict-affected and post-conflict societies. This international practice has been globally present in the last thirty years and has had a profound influence on the post-war developments of the countries in the Global South. By focusing on the Balkan, Middle East, and Sub-Saharan Africa case studies, the course tries to assess achievements and shortcomings of the dominant form of peacebuilding - liberal peacebuilding. It also offers a deeper understanding of the liberal peacebuilding critique and its alternative forms - local (bottom-up) peacebuilding, everyday peace, and hybridity. Finally, the course provides a comparative overview of the impact of peacebuilding on political and socio-economic institutions in post-conflict and conflict-affected societies. The course is grounded in critical peace and conflict studies and offers the perspective of a Global South scholars who have personal encounters with the practice of peacebuilding.

Ishodi učenja (stečena znanja)

By the end of the course, students should be able to:
- Inform themselves about the process of peacebuilding and international interventions in the Global South;
- Identify and critically analyse key actors, processes and modes of intervention in contemporary peacebuilding missions;
- Evaluate political and socio-economic effects of liberal peacebuidling in post-conflict and conflict-affected societies;
- Recognize and critically assess responds made by local populations in relations to development model enforced upon them;
- Understand how violent conflict and peacebuilding could affect human development indicators in post-conflict and conflict-affected societies.

Sadržaj teorijske nastave

1. Introductory lecture
2. Global Violence Revisited
3. Peacebuilding in post-conflict societies
4. Liberal peacebuilding
5. The hybridity, local peace and the resistance
6. The case study: Bosnia and Herzegovina
7. Coffee talk: Discussion about the book “Peaceland” by Severine Autesserre
8. Midterm assignments presentation
9. Reconciliation in divided societies
10. The case study: Reconciliation in former Yugoslavia
11. Peacebuilding, gender and sexual violence: Discussion about the movie “The Whistlerblower”
12. Student presentations
13. Reading week
14. Reading week
15. Exam

1. Autesserre, Severine. 2014. Peaceland. New York: Cambridge University Press

2. Mac, Andrew. 2007. Global Political Violence: Explaining the Post-Cold War Decline. International Peace Academy

3. Ramsbotham, Oliver, Woodhouse, Tom and Miall, Hugh. 2016. Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge: Polity, 68-109

4. Bellamy, Alex and Paul Williams. 2010. Understanding Peacekeeping. London: Polity, 173-278

5. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2010. “Hybrid Peace: The Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Peace.” Security Dialogue 41 (4): 391–412

6. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2014. “Everyday Peace: Bottom-Up and Local Agency in Conflict-Affected Societies.” Security Dialogue, 45 (6): 548-564

7. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2011. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.19-47

8. Richmond, Oliver. 2014. Failed Statebuilding. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 62-103 only

9. Paris, Roland. 2010. “Saving Liberal Peacebuilding.” Review of International Studies 36 (2): 337-365

10. Chandler, David. 2014. “Resilience and the ‘Everyday’: Beyond the Paradox of “Liberal Peace”.” Review of International Studies 41 (1): 27–48

11. Lemay-Hebert, Nicolas. 2011.The "Empty-Shell Approach: The Setup Process of International Administrations in Timor-Leste and Kosovo, Its Consequences and Lessons." International Studies Perspectives 12: 190–211

12. Chandler, David. 2006. "State-Building in Bosnia: The Limits of ‘Informal Trusteeship’" . International Journal of Peace Studies 11 (1)

13. Franks, Jason and Richmond, P. Oliver. 2008. "Coopting Liberal Peace-building: Untying the Gordian Knot in Kosovo." Cooperation and Conflict 43: 81-103

14. Belloni, Roberto. 2001. "Civil Society and Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina." Journal of Peace Research 38 (2): 163-180

15. David, Lea. 2017. “Against Standardization of Memory.” Human Rights Quarterly 39 (2): 296-318

16. Jansen, Stef. 2013. “If Reconciliation Is the Answer, Are We Asking the Right Questions?” Studies in Social Justice 7 (2): 229-243

17. Miloš Bešić and Nemanja Džuverović. 2020. “How many truths are there? Reconciliation and agonistic dialogue in the former Yugoslavia.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20 (3): 455-472

18. Hamber, Brandon, Dineo Nageng and Gabriel O'Malley. 2000. “Telling It Like It Is...: Understanding the Truth and Reconciliation Commission from the Perspective of Survivors.” Psychology in Society 26: 18-42

19. Theidon, Kimberly. 2007. "Gender in Transition: Common Sense, Women, and War." Journal of Human Rights 6(4): 453-478

20. Hromadzic, Azra. 2006. "Challenging the Discourse of the Bosnian War Rapes." In Johnson, Janet E., and Jean C. Robinson, eds., Living with Gender after Communism. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, pp. 169-184

21. Das, Veena. 2004. "Language and Body: Transactions in the Construction of Pain." In Scheper-Hughes and Bourgois, eds., Violence in War and Peace: An Anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 327-333

22. Levy, Barry S., et.al. 2008. "Part IV: Vulnerable Populations." In Levy and Sidel, eds. War and Public Health. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 179-226

23. (movie) Why We Fight, directed by Eugene Jarecki, 2005

24. (movie) The Whistleblower, directed by Larysa Kondracki, 2010

25. (movie) No Man’s Land, directed by Danis Tanovic, 2001

26. (movie) Tangerines, directed by Zaza Urushadze, 2013

27. (movie) Hotel Rwanda, directed by Terry George, 2004

lectures, book discussions, movie discussions, ethnographic fieldwork, visit to museums, protests and rallies, student presentations, one on one supervision, peer mentorship